Saturday, April 21, 2012

The Third Wave, the Supremacy of the Rule of Law, and the Leveling of Democratic Space




A 
s the minute hand of the clock above the wall of the living room inched toward twelve o’clock midnight, each ticking of the sound of the clock signals that another brand new day will start. Writing again in my blog after the long hiatus is quite exciting as it leads one’s minds towards self-discovery and reflection on the cheerfulness and promise of tomorrow. It is indeed quite good to think deeper during the silence of the night under the silver clear moonlight and twinkling little shiny stars above the night sky. While I am having my random thoughts in front of my laptop about some stuff on the different things around us, I cannot help but think of the wonders of the technological revolution our present generation is living through.  
 
We are lucky because in this fast-paced age of modern technology and information superhighway, everything would be just one mouse click away. Indeed, the world has changed for it successfully passed through the three different stages of revolution – from the agricultural phase to the information age, which is a full-proof of Alvin Toffler’s Third Wave.   The transition from the agricultural to industrial based economy which puts primacy importance to land, capital and other physical assets or factors of production paved the way to information age where there is an increasingly free flow and exchange of ideas in the marketplace. 

In the advent of electronic age and internet revolution, there was a considerable anxiety that the sweeping change in this modern-day era would lead to the end of human freedom, abolition of individual’s right to privacy, and perhaps state disintegration. Nonetheless, these predictions subside as the digital and electronic information superhighway transcends boundaries across time and space by demonstrating the opposite of the aforementioned anticipations. It has, instead, been an effective tool in espousing the libertarian spirit and leveling of the democratic space where each individual has the right to speak one’s mind and thoughts on issues that greatly affect them by using different platforms and social media. Globalization and the concomitant effects of internet revolution has propelled the worldwide recognition and promotion of human rights and strengthening of the international human rights’ laws as well as cooperation between and among state parties, international organizations and other similar institutions in the delivery of borderless justice. The recent concurrence of the Senate of the Philippines on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of Justice was a development for the strengthening of human rights and the supremacy of the rule of law. 

In all cases, the Third Wave which we currently experiencing undoubtedly gives rise to the so-called e-governance never before been deciphered by our great political thinkers a long, long, time ago. The decentralization and the opportunity of our leaders to reach out for their constituents at the grassroots level through innovative ways of doing things facilitates the two-way street of communication between the central and the periphery as well as responding to the needs and demands of the governed. I just wonder if we have Time Machine that could transport us to and from the past, present and future and share the bountiful wonders of Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, Multiply and other social networking sites to our great, great forefathers. If there could have been other platforms of communication during World War I and II, leaders of great nations would be able see themselves in the sea of understanding. Indeed, if only we can see the future, we can be much happier and feel more fulfilled because we can do something to make things better. 

The freedom of expression guaranteed under the 1987 Philippine Constitution which springs from our natural inherent right as an individual is indeed priceless.  John Stuart Mill,[1] however, reminds in his Liberty, that the liberty of the individual must be, thus, far, limited; he must not make himself a nuisance to other people. Pope Leo XIII[2] Libertas Praestantissimum (1888) on Human Liberty emphasizes that true liberty of human society does not consist in every man doing what he pleases, for this would simply end in turmoil and confusion and bring on the overthrow of the state. He espoused then the necessity of obedience to the supreme and eternal law, which is on the authority of God, commanding good and forbidding evil. 

As we reap the wonders of technological revolution brought about by the Third Wave, the foregoing principles from our great political thinkers reverberate continuously. It echoes the same reflection that in the exercise of our fundamental human rights as citizens of a democratic and republican state we have always the social responsibility to obey and respect the supremacy of the rule of law.


[1] Curtis, Michael. 1981. The Great Political Theories: The New Expanded Edition.
[2] Ibid

No comments:

Post a Comment